„Spjall:Eldgosið á Fimmvörðuhálsi 2010“: Munur á milli breytinga
Efni eytt Efni bætt við
Lína 50:
:::::More generally: Toponyms aren't devised by consistent robots working from a standard criteria. Even if you find something in Iceland that contradicts the general rule of thumb I cited above, that doesn't change the situation for Eyjafjallajökull. --[[Notandi:Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason|Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason]] 19. apríl 2010 kl. 22:50 (UTC)
:::::Wow, that "Your argumentation isn't serious [...]" certainly came accross as remarkably arrogant and dismissive, Rémih. As far as I can see, Ævar is absolutely right in what he says. --[[Notandi:Cessator|Cessator]] 20. apríl 2010 kl. 02:35 (UTC)
::::::Yes, I'm "arrogant and dismissive" but I don't care if you think that. I don't said that Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason isn't serious, only the argumentation isn't.
::::::If the area under the ice cap is unnamed, what title must have the article about the eruption at the summit of the volcano and at Fimmvörðuháls ? This area isn't under the ice cap, so we have a problem. Isn't it ? [[Notandi:Rémih|Rémih]] 20. apríl 2010 kl. 08:48 (UTC)
| |||